Easy to me Domain and Hosting Affiliate

Permanent short link for Go Daddy.com Just ez2.me
Spring Savings! $7.99 .com
Next time for Go Daddy: Easy to you just www.ez2.me Dadicated link for Go Daddy.com Just ez2.me

Monday, August 8, 2011

Independent Palestine May Prove A Mirage

Israeli officials said this framework would be a package deal whereby Israel would agree to entering negotiations using the 1967 lines, with mutually agreed upon swaps, as the baseline of talks; and the Palestinians would agree that the final goal of negotiations would be two states, a Palestinian one and Jewish one.


The Post views this framework as a concession because the Palestinians would get "something they have long sought": They "would get the 1967 lines as the baseline" for negotiations.


What? The 1967 lines have always been the starting point for negotiations, going back to United Nations Security Resolution 242 of November 1967. What else could they be?


Israel, obviously, wouldn't want negotiators to use the 1948 lines as the baseline. In fact, no Israeli government ever questioned that the 1967 lines would be the baseline for negotiations until Netanyahu came to Washington in May and said that he rejected that commitment. After the 1967 war, Prime Minister Levi Eshkol famously said that Israel was in a position to "negotiate peace with the Arabs" because it now had territory it could give up. And every prime minister since has agreed. Except Netanyahu.


But Netanyahu now says that using the 1967 lines is okay, and all the gullible types say: "Hooray, a concession!" No way. Netanyahu just moved the goalposts back to where they've been for 44 years. Big deal.


In any case, all he did was agree that he would negotiate with a map of the 1967 lines in front of him. He didn't say that he would give up any territory during those negotiations. And he has consistently rejected a settlement freeze, let alone the dismantling of any settlements. In fact, he just authorised 900 new settlement units. Obviously, there can be no deal with the settlements and the bypass roads and the checkpoints chopping Palestine into an Israeli salad.


Netanyahu has no interest in negotiations. What he wants is to prevent the Palestinians from taking their aspirations for statehood to the United Nations this autumn. He thinks they are so brainless that they will accept an empty offer from him rather than try something new, something which - whether it succeeds or not - will fundamentally change the political terrain in a way Netanyahu most certainly will not welcome.


More evidence of the utter phoniness of Netanyahu's new stance comes with the news that the Knesset is now considering a bill - supported by 40 legislators from Kadima, Likud, and Yisrael Beiteinu - that would, according to Haaretz: "make democratic rule subservient to the state's definition as 'the national home for the Jewish people'."


The lead sponsor of the bill says that it is intended to give the courts legislation that supports "the state as the Jewish nation state in ruling in situations in which the Jewish character of the state clashes with its democratic character."


The bill is likely to pass - 20 of the 28 members of the "moderate" Kadima party have joined Likud in pushing it - which would mean that Israel will be making that long-predicted choice between being democratic or Jewish - a choice that would be unnecessary if Israel gave up the 1967 territories.


Under the guidance and chairmanship of Theodor Herzl, the founder of modern Zionism, and as a symbolic parliament for those in agreement with the implementation of Zionist goals, the Congress gathered around 200 delegates from 17 countries.


The key issues on the agenda of the1897 Zionist Congress were the presentation of Herzl's plans, the establishment of the Zionist Organisation and the declaration of Zionism's goals. More specifically, the version of the programme that was submitted to the Congress stated: "Zionism seeks to establish a home for the Jewish people in Palestine secured under public law."


The political programme, known as the Basel Programme, resolved: "Zionism aims at establishing for the Jewish people a publicly and legally assured home in Palestine. For the attainment of this purpose, the Congress considers the following means serviceable:


The promotion of the settlement of Jewish agriculturists, artisans, and tradesmen in Palestine,


The federation of all Jews into local or general groups, according to the laws of the various countries,


The strengthening of the Jewish feeling and consciousness, and


Preparatory steps for the attainment of those governmental grants, which are necessary to the achievement of the Zionist purpose."


Theodor Herzl wrote in his diary on September 1, 1897: "Were I to sum up the Basel Congress in a word – which I shall guard against pronouncing publicly – it would be this: At Basel I founded the Jewish State. If I said this out loud today l would be greeted by universal laughter. In five years perhaps, and certainly in fifty years, everyone will perceive it."


This is exactly what happened: 50 years later the Jewish State was indeed founded.


Subsequent Congresses established various institutions for promoting the Basel programme, notably a people's bank known as the Jewish Colonial Trust, which was the financial instrument of political Zionism.


Its establishment was suggested at the First Zionist Congress in 1897 and the first definite steps toward its institution were taken at the Second Zionist Congress in Cologne, Germany, in May 1898, nine months after the First Zionist Congress in Basel.


At the Fifth Zionist Congress, the Jewish National Fund was set up for the purchase of land in the Land of Israel. Later, the Zionist Commission was founded with subsidiary societies for the study and improvement of the social and economic condition of the Jews within the Land of Israel.


The Zionist Congress met every year between 1897 and 1901, then except for war years, every second year.


In 1942, an 'Extraordinary Zionist Conference' was convened; it announced a fundamental departure from traditional Zionist policy demanding "that Palestine be established as a Jewish Commonwealth".


It became the official Zionist stance and ultimate aim of the movement. Since World War II, meetings have been organised approximately every four years and in the aftermath of the creation of the State of Israel, the Congress has been held in Jerusalem – a concrete indication that the Zionist programme has already decided to establish Jerusalem as the capital of the Jewish State of Israel.


In 1936, the World Jewish Congress (WJC) was founded in Geneva as an international federation of Jewish communities and organisations. Its mission: to serve as "the diplomatic arm of the Jewish people".


Membership in the WJC was declared open to all representative Jewish groups or communities, irrespective of the social, political or economic ideology of the community’s host country.


The World Jewish Congress is supported by those communities and individual members who as concerned Jewish citizens want their voices to be heard on matters of concern to the Jewish people.


The WJC, its institutions, commissions and sub-bodies enjoy special credentials and recognition at the United Nations. Its headquarters are in New York, and the organisation maintains international offices in Brussels; Jerusalem; Paris; Moscow; Buenos Aires, and Geneva.


The WJC is made up of five regional branches: WJC North America, the Latin American Jewish Congress, the European Jewish Congress, the Euro-Asian Jewish Congress, and the WJC Israel.


Besides, Jewish communities in 92 countries are directly affiliated to the World Jewish Congress. The last meeting of the WJC Plenary Assembly, attended by over 400 delegates from 62 countries, was held in Jerusalem in January 2009.


From the above, it is evident that what happened on the Middle East stage, had been planned by the 1897 Zionist Congress. It would be the exclusive mission of the successive Israeli governments to find ways how to ensure its strict implementation.


The fact is that the Jewish State of Israel has been created; all Palestinian territories have been occupied; Jewish settlements have been established on all of the them; Jerusalem has been unilaterally declared as the capital of Israel, and the Jewish lobbies have been active everywhere to help further implement the Zionist Programme.


This programme has no room for a fully independent, sovereign, viable Palestine State as agreed by the international community since 1948.


The current Israeli government led by Benjamin Netanyahu, in a truthful fulfilment of its role in the Zionist Programme, has repeatedly heralded the real state of affairs – that is, no return to the 1967 borders; Israel for Jewish people only; Jerusalem is the capital of Israel only; full security for Israel only; no sovereignty to a Palestinian state; no return of Palestinian refugees, and no stop to Israeli settlements.


Why then did President Obama decide to state on September 23, 2009 before the United Nations General Assembly that "the time has come to re-launch negotiations – without preconditions – that address the permanent-status issues: security for Israelis and Palestinians; borders, refugees, and Jerusalem"? Similar statements have been repeated on other occasions.


Why did Obama emphasise that "the goal is clear: two states living side by side in peace and security – a Jewish State of Israel, with true security for all Israelis; and a viable, independent Palestinian state with contiguous territory that ends the occupation that began in 1967, and realises the potential of the Palestinian people"?


Why did the U.S. President say that he "does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements"?


Why is Obama still insisting on giving the impression that another solution is possible?


Is it part of a new game of securing U.S. full control over what his predecessor called the Great Middle East project?


Perhaps it is just that the U.S. establishment has not informed the "most powerful man on earth" – the U.S. president (at least in formal terms) – that the solution to the so-called Middle East conflict had been set 112 years ago and has so far been successfully implemented.

No comments:

Post a Comment